{"id":11464,"date":"2014-09-18T12:12:59","date_gmt":"2014-09-18T16:12:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/?p=11464"},"modified":"2014-09-18T12:12:59","modified_gmt":"2014-09-18T16:12:59","slug":"is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-or-just-shallow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/is-the-internet-making-us-stupid-or-just-shallow\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the Internet making us stupid? Or just shallow?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_11464\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"11464\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" version=\"1.0\" viewBox=\"0 0 502 315\" preserveAspectRatio=\"xMidYMid meet\"><g transform=\"translate(0,332) scale(0.1,-0.1)\" fill=\"\" stroke=\"none\"><path d=\"M2394 3279 l-29 -30 -3 -207 c-2 -182 0 -211 15 -242 39 -76 157 -76 196 0 15 31 17 60 15 243 l-3 209 -33 29 c-26 23 -41 29 -80 29 -41 0 -53 -5 -78 -31z\"\/><path d=\"M3085 3251 c-45 -19 -58 -50 -96 -229 -47 -217 -49 -260 -13 -295 52 -53 146 -42 177 20 16 31 87 366 87 410 0 70 -86 122 -155 94z\"\/><path d=\"M1751 3234 c-13 -9 -29 -31 -37 -50 -12 -29 -10 -49 21 -204 19 -94 39 -189 45 -210 14 -50 54 -80 110 -80 34 0 48 6 76 34 21 21 34 44 34 59 0 14 -18 113 -40 219 -37 178 -43 195 -70 221 -36 32 -101 37 -139 11z\"\/><path d=\"M1163 3073 c-36 -7 -73 -59 -73 -102 0 -56 133 -378 171 -413 34 -32 83 -37 129 -13 70 36 67 87 -16 290 -86 209 -89 214 -129 231 -35 14 -42 15 -82 7z\"\/><path d=\"M3689 3066 c-15 -9 -33 -30 -42 -48 -48 -103 -147 -355 -147 -375 0 -98 131 -148 192 -74 13 15 57 108 97 206 80 196 84 226 37 273 -30 30 -99 39 -137 18z\"\/><path d=\"M583 2784 c-38 -19 -67 -74 -58 -113 9 -42 211 -354 242 -373 16 -10 45 -18 66 -18 51 0 107 52 107 100 0 39 -1 41 -124 234 -80 126 -108 162 -133 173 -41 17 -61 16 -100 -3z\"\/><path d=\"M4250 2784 c-14 -9 -74 -91 -133 -183 -95 -150 -107 -173 -107 -213 0 -55 33 -94 87 -104 67 -13 90 8 211 198 130 202 137 225 78 284 -27 27 -42 34 -72 34 -22 0 -50 -8 -64 -16z\"\/><path d=\"M2275 2693 c-553 -48 -1095 -270 -1585 -649 -135 -104 -459 -423 -483 -476 -23 -49 -22 -139 2 -186 73 -142 361 -457 571 -626 285 -228 642 -407 990 -497 242 -63 336 -73 660 -74 310 0 370 5 595 52 535 111 1045 392 1455 803 122 121 250 273 275 326 19 41 19 137 0 174 -41 79 -309 363 -465 492 -447 370 -946 591 -1479 653 -113 14 -422 18 -536 8z m395 -428 c171 -34 330 -124 456 -258 112 -119 167 -219 211 -378 27 -96 24 -300 -5 -401 -72 -255 -236 -447 -474 -557 -132 -62 -201 -76 -368 -76 -167 0 -236 14 -368 76 -213 98 -373 271 -451 485 -162 444 86 934 547 1084 153 49 292 57 452 25z m909 -232 c222 -123 408 -262 593 -441 76 -74 138 -139 138 -144 0 -16 -233 -242 -330 -319 -155 -123 -309 -223 -461 -299 l-81 -41 32 46 c18 26 49 83 70 128 143 306 141 649 -6 957 -25 52 -61 116 -79 142 l-34 47 45 -20 c26 -10 76 -36 113 -56z m-2057 25 c-40 -58 -105 -190 -130 -263 -110 -324 -59 -707 132 -981 25 -35 42 -64 37 -64 -19 0 -241 119 -326 174 -188 122 -406 314 -532 468 l-58 71 108 103 c185 178 428 349 672 473 66 33 121 60 123 61 2 0 -10 -19 -26 -42z\"\/><path d=\"M2375 1950 c-198 -44 -350 -190 -395 -379 -18 -76 -8 -221 19 -290 114 -284 457 -406 731 -260 98 52 188 154 231 260 27 69 37 214 19 290 -38 163 -166 304 -326 360 -67 23 -215 33 -279 19z\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/i> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" alt=\"Loading\" src=\"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader-2x.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p><a title=\"Chainsawsuit\" href=\"http:\/\/chainsawsuit.com\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/chainsawsuit.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/20140916-research.png\" alt=\"Click the first\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>In my never-ending search for some bit of knowledge one day,<\/strong> during a mix-and-match of search engine terms while looking for classical writers&#8217; views on death and dying, I stumbled onto what might have been an off-kilter New Age site, <a title=\"OM Times\" href=\"http:\/\/omtimes.com\/2014\/06\/8-things-you-didnt-know-about-death\/\" target=\"_blank\">OM Times<\/a>, or more likely, a parody of the genre. On the page titled &#8220;8 Things You Didn\u2019t Know About Death,&#8221; I read,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230; light rays have qualities like wisdom, kindness, compassion and intelligence. This light makes visible what is invisible on earth, the Divine nature of all things&#8230;.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Loud guffaws broke the cool silence of the house and startled the cats sleeping on the dining room table nearby. Light rays have wisdom? Intelligence? I almost snorted tea through my nose I laughed so hard. It <em>had<\/em> to be a parody.<\/p>\n<p>Codswallop almost always makes me laugh. At first. Then, as I perused the site more, I got worried at how much of it there was. A lot of effort put into a parody, it seemed. Do people <em>actually<\/em> believe this stuff? Or are all the New Age websites really satirical, like the Onion, making fun of popular\u00a0beliefs, superstitions and fears?<\/p>\n<p>Surely some of them must be poking us in the metaphorical ribs with a wink and a nudge. It&#8217;s hard to believe they&#8217;re serious\u00a0when you check the other stories on this site. With articles headlined by lines like:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Are Your Loved Ones Sending You A Message From Beyond?<\/li>\n<li>10 Signs That You Were Born a Mystic<\/li>\n<li>Top 10 Traits to Identify an Indigo<\/li>\n<li>Numerology: September Forecast<\/li>\n<li>The Science of Miracles<\/li>\n<li>The 7 Most Common Messages from Spirits<\/li>\n<li>My Life As an Earth Angel<\/li>\n<li>Crystals For Reiki<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>You <em>have<\/em> to think they&#8217;re pulling your leg. And pulling it hard. None of this stuff is real; it&#8217;s all piffle; no one can take this malarkey\u00a0seriously. <em>Miracles? Numerology? Crystals?<\/em> Just look at the opening of the story titled, &#8220;Travelling to the New Earth:&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There is a place beyond the Fifth Dimension where a new vision is taking shape, where mankind is getting a proverbial \u2018do-over.\u2019 This place is called \u2018the New Earth.\u2019 It exists in a dimensional space above the fifth dimension somewhere in the sixth and seventh dimensional areas accessible by meditation and through \u2018stargates\u2019 some of which are physical and some of which are energetic. Thus, many are able to visit the New Earth in meditation.<br \/>\nThe New Earth is a high vibrational area where we all hope to live one day. It is free of fear and conflict. I am told it is the highest expression of Heaven on Earth or Shamballa.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I know, I know. I nearly laughed myself into a fit when I read that. There must be an app for creating winky New Age stories out there that lets you mix all the buzz words and goofy ideas together and come out with something that can be published here. This stuff makes Harry Potter read like a documentary.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Another site that&#8217;s surely a parody is <a title=\"Before Its News\" href=\"http:\/\/beforeitsnews.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Before Its News<\/a>. It&#8217;s dubbed as &#8220;alternative news.&#8221; I expect that&#8217;s\u00a0in the same way\u00a0homeopathy &#8211; the apex\u00a0of gullibility\u00a0&#8211; is dubbed\u00a0&#8220;alternative&#8221; medicine. As in nudge-nudge, wink-wink. Here are a few of its headlines:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Massive Mars Base Destroyed Sept 15\/16<\/li>\n<li>3,000-Year-Old Bible Mystery Surfaces\u2013What It Reveals Is Scary As Hell! The Biggest Catastrophe Ever\u2013and Most Are Not Prepared! (Jaw Dropping Videos)<\/li>\n<li>\u201c1,700 Foot Tidal Wave? \u2018Son, it\u2019s time to pray\u2026\u2019\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Dragon\u2019s Mummy Was Discovered In The Carpathian Mountains \u2013 Proof Dragon Actually Existed (Photos and Videos)<\/li>\n<li>Old Mysterious Photos that will Haunt Your Dreams<\/li>\n<li>Ancient Flying Machine 8 Soldiers Disappear Removing It From Afghan Cave<\/li>\n<li>Alien Phenomenon Stuns Witnesses and Experts\u2013Shocking Mystery In Sky Seen by Thousands\u2013Government Cam Malfunctions At Same Time!<\/li>\n<li>Sharia Law and Islam to Explode in US as Elite Fund it Using This as Their Secret Weapon\u2026<\/li>\n<li>Prince William ~ The Cloned Anti-Christ<\/li>\n<li>Satanic Ritual Taking Over USA\u2013You or Someone You Know Has Probably Done This Unaware\u2013and You Will Be Shocked! (Videos)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The last story warns readers that the icebucket challenge for ALS is really a &#8220;satanic ritual:&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cI recently found out about the Ice Bucket Challenge and I really didn\u2019t pay attention to it until a good friend mentioned that an ex-satanist friend said that this is the very same ritual he did when he was a satanist and was like a covenant contract with the devil.\u201d<br \/>\nThen, after researching this further, the author of this article writes:<br \/>\nThe enemy has come into America through the back door with what seems like a good work and a good cause but it is only on the surface. As you dig a little deeper and take the time to research, you will see that what I am saying is true. This is a type of sacrifice. It is a type of satanic sacrifice. All these human embryos are being sacrificed. A type of cannibalism is occurring because this craze and this phenomena is causing people to give into this one fund and neglecting other good and noble foundations that have have better causes and more moral ones. There is definitely a spirit behind this cause and it is not the Holy Spirit. God would never endorse such a fundraiser that supports using human embryos for research. It is abortion, plain and simple. To all those who have already participated, there is no condemnation, but there is a plea from the heart of God to pray, seek his face and ask forgiveness. I really didn\u2019t want to post anything for or against this challenge.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether to laugh or cry at the writer&#8217;s incoherent, paranoid religious rambling. It <em>has<\/em> to be a joke, although I can&#8217;t get the punchline or why anyone would find it funny. Must be my own lack in the humour sensitivity department.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the opening of the piece on the destruction of the Mars base:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In this Sept 16th update from Linda Newkirk you will learn that our Saviour has now fulfilled His recent promise on Jan 11th to throw the NWO Satanists and their ET alliance down off of Mars and shut them out of the new inter-dimensional portal. From what Linda understands after hearing numerous conversations amongst some of those involved, a massive underground base on Mars with an area of three to four square miles has been destroyed on the night of Sept 15\/16. Great numbers of humans, greys, reptiles and even some of the Annunaki are now in hell or outer darkness. Many of the Illuminati elite were in the base at the time. One of their reasons for being there was to sacrifice substantial numbers of children to Satan!<\/p>\n<p>In this post Linda also recaps many Revelation 12 events leading up to this point in time that people may be better able to better understand these very complicated and supernatural works of the Lord. Be prepared for a lengthy read. Those who have been following Revelation 12 and are familiar with the recent updates\/events may want to scroll down for the new update about the destruction of the Mars base.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is a bizarre mix of supermarket tabloid nonsense, conspiracy theories, New Age bunk and religious codswallop. Some of these stories refer to &#8220;<a title=\"Claptrap\" href=\"http:\/\/worldtruth.tv\/\" target=\"_blank\">World Truth TV<\/a>&#8221; as their source &#8211; which is\u00a0another site full of outrageous, paranoid, and usually silly bunk. It clearly uses the word &#8220;truth&#8221; like North Korea calls itself the &#8220;people&#8217;s&#8217; republic&#8221; &#8211; in jest. Take at look at some headlines from world &#8220;truthiness:&#8221;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Satanic Temple To Distribute Materials To School Children In Florida<\/li>\n<li>The Baltic Sea Anomaly \u2013 14,000 Year Fossilized UFO\/USO Crash Site<\/li>\n<li>Futuristic Floating City Could Soon Become A Reality?<\/li>\n<li>\u2018Genetically Modified Micro Humans\u2019 To Be \u2018Farmed\u2019 For Drug Testing By 2017<\/li>\n<li>Leaving Their Bodies, These People Saw Things Later Verified?<\/li>\n<li>America\u2019s Rise And Fall And The Mystery Of The Year Of The Shmita<\/li>\n<li>3,000 Year Old Bible Mystery Surfaces<\/li>\n<li>Top 10 Things You Shouldn\u2019t Know About The Ubiquitous \u201cIlluminati\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Lluminati Occult Symbols At Sochi 2014 Olympic Opening Ceremony<\/li>\n<li>Foods Scientifically Proven To Kill Cancer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Like the previous site, they&#8217;re all risible.<\/p>\n<p>But you should notice some things most of these sites \u00a0have in common: paranoia (about the government, and mysterious occult organizations); religious (specifically literalist Christian) fervour; Biblical quotes (usually one particular\u00a0translation of the Bible, not the actual Bible) to justify wild claims; uses of words like proven, science and reality\u00a0to describe fantasy or fiction; so-called &#8220;self-help&#8221; articles about food, do-it-yourself medical cures\u00a0and\u00a0diets with no medical basis; and scientific-looking articles that are actually pseudoscience based on opinion, superstition or simply anecdote.<\/p>\n<p>Now in a reasoned society, one in which people used their grey matter to actually think about these things, to assess the logic of the claims, this sort of content would simply pass as either satirical or crazy. Crazy to the point where you wonder if the writers suffer from sever psychological problems. People who should spend more time in rubber rooms than in front of computers. This stuff is really that insane. So it must be a parody, <em>right<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>But I sometimes get an uneasy feeling, a scratchy foreboding that these <em>aren&#8217;t<\/em> satires. Some people &#8211; authors <em>and<\/em> audience &#8211; might actually believe this stuff. That the internet is making us crazy.<\/p>\n<p>That leads to the wake-up-in-the-middle-of-the-night fear there are people whose critical thinking faculties are so dead or dying\u00a0that\u00a0they cannot tell the difference between bunk and fact, between pseudoscience and science, between imagination and empirical evidence. They cannot\u00a0discern this is claptrap because they no longer can identify the border between fantasy and reality.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Book review\" href=\"http:\/\/admajoremblog.blogspot.ca\/2010\/09\/shallows-what-internet-is-doing-to-our.html\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/_FyRL2vcn2PM\/TIZBIIzJfaI\/AAAAAAAAARY\/5VV7KbkeOvk\/s1600\/The+Shallows.jpg\" alt=\"The Shallows\" width=\"200\" \/><\/a>Is the internet doing this to us? Is the internet making us stupid? Or just lazy and shallow? Nicholas Carr (author of <a title=\"Nicholas Carr\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theshallowsbook.com\/nicholascarr\/Nicholas_Carrs_The_Shallows.html\" target=\"_blank\">The Shallows)<\/a> posed this question in an article in <a title=\"The Atlantic\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2008\/07\/is-google-making-us-stupid\/306868\/\" target=\"_blank\">Atlantic Magazine<\/a>, back in 2008. He wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Over the past few years I\u2019ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn\u2019t going\u2014so far as I can tell\u2014but it\u2019s changing. I\u2019m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I\u2019m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I\u2019d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That\u2019s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I\u2019m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Reviewing Carr&#8217;s subsequent book in the <a title=\"NY Times review\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/06\/06\/books\/review\/Lehrer-t.html?_r=1&amp;\" target=\"_blank\">New York Times<\/a>, Jonah Leher wrote,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;Carr argues that we are sabotaging ourselves, trading away the seriousness of sustained attention for the frantic superficiality of the Internet. As Carr first observed in his much discussed 2008 article in The Atlantic, \u201cIs Google Making Us Stupid?,\u201d the mere existence of the online world has made it much harder (at least for him) to engage with difficult texts and complex ideas. \u201cOnce I was a scuba diver in a sea of words,\u201d Carr writes, with typical eloquence. \u201cNow I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And a<a title=\"NPR.org\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=127988880\" target=\"_blank\"> review on NPR<\/a> noted:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Shallows is a rebuttal to those who unquestioningly accept a life in which information is unlimited, easily accessed but fractured and unmoored from context, and where people are constantly online and multitasking among e-mail, Facebook and websites. Extrapolating from the sagacity of Western philosophers like Plato and Marshall McLuhan and guided by recent, pertinent discoveries in neuroscience, Carr argues that the Internet physically &#8220;rewires&#8221; our brain to where we end up acting like computers \u2014 avaricious gobblers of information \u2013- and our grip on what it means to be human slackens.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Is Carr right that the technology is driving us, rather than the other way around? I believe so, based on both my research and my own observations. Carr quotes\u00a0Ralph Waldo Emerson, who wrote, &#8220;Things are in the saddle \/ and ride mankind.&#8221; <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(Here&#8217;s a good, albeit lengthy, overview of Carr&#8217;s book on <a title=\"A Puff of Absurdity\" href=\"http:\/\/apuffofabsurdity.blogspot.ca\/2014\/09\/the-shallows-what-internet-is-doing-to.html\" target=\"_blank\">A Puff of Absurdity<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>A story in <a title=\"Psychology Topday\" href=\"http:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/blog\/mr-personality\/201305\/is-technology-making-us-stupid-and-smarter\" target=\"_blank\">Psychology Today<\/a> noted that the internet is changing the way we think and may actually be rewiring our brains:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Humans today are like most smartphones and tablets &#8211; their ability to solve problems depends not on the knowledge they can store but on their capacity to connect to a place where they can retrieve the answer to find a solution. This is what some have labelled the &#8220;hyper-link&#8221; economy&#8230; the only knowledge we need to have is the knowledge of where to find stuff.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The internet has made many of us us lazy simply because of the ease by which we can access content. Some people easily\u00a0accept what they read or see as real without doing any work to confirm or deny it, or to parse it through the normal filters of reason and logic. That&#8217;s why people still buy into scams and hoaxes, like emails where Microsoft promises to send you money for sharing. A simple search for urban legends, or a visit to Snopes.com will debunk it for anyone who makes the effort.<\/p>\n<p>But you need to\u00a0make the effort for the effect to happen. There is no filter on the internet that you can use to, say, just get factual information, shorn of opinions; no way to get Google to produce science not pseudoscience; no way to separate political data from political rants. No way to rank content by validity.<\/p>\n<p>All online content appears amorphous; a cloud in which all content is given equal value. What pops up in the first page is more likely to be what people chose, instead of spending time examining several pages to discover which, if any, are actually relevant to the searcher&#8217;s goals, which may contain fact as opposed to fiction (like the difference between the science behind vaccinations and the superstition-fueled, scare-tactic-pseudoscience of\u00a0the anti-vaxxer movement).<\/p>\n<p>An <a title=\"Australian Study\" href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/technology\/sci-tech\/internet-makes-us-stupid-study-20140712-zt5it.html\" target=\"_blank\">Australian study<\/a> into the effect of the internet on thinking said it boldly:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Is the internet making us stupid? That&#8217;s the question researchers from Wellington&#8217;s Victoria University asked in a study on people&#8217;s reading behaviour.<br \/>\nAnd the answer is: yes.<br \/>\nWe might have more access to information than ever before, but reading things online actually has a negative impact on people&#8217;s cognition.<br \/>\nAssociate professor Val Hooper and master&#8217;s student Channa Herath&#8217;s analysis of online and offline reading behaviour found that online reading generally does not have a positive impact on people&#8217;s cognition.<br \/>\nConcentration, comprehension, absorption and recall rates when engaging with online material were all much lower than traditional text.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We appear to be\u00a0losing the skills of being critical, of analyzing, even of thinking in a logical manner through\u00a0the convenience of the internet. Because we&#8217;re humans, and intrinsically inclined to comfort, we tend to gravitate to\u00a0the content\u00a0that already agrees with out preconceptions rather than that which challenges them. We often don&#8217;t put our brains in gear when we start surfing: we just go with the flow we already expect.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"BBC\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.com\/future\/story\/20131125-why-the-stupid-say-theyre-smart\" target=\"_blank\">A recent story on the\u00a0BBC<\/a> suggests that as we lose these crucial skills, paradoxically we think we&#8217;re getting smarter:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Psychologists have shown that we are more likely to be blind to our own failings than perhaps we realise. This could explain why some incompetent people are so annoying, and also inject a healthy dose of humility into our own sense of self-regard.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;research has shown that this &#8220;unskilled and unaware of it&#8221; effect holds in real-life situations, not just in abstract laboratory tests. For example, hunters who know the least about firearms also have the most inaccurate view of their firearm knowledge, and doctors with the worst patient-interviewing skills are the least likely to recognise their inadequacies.<\/p>\n<p>What has become known as the Dunning-Kruger effect is an example of what psychologists call metacognition \u2013 thinking about thinking. It\u2019s also something that should give us all pause for thought. The effect might just explain the apparently baffling self belief of some of your friends and colleagues.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which means we can&#8217;t see our own ignorance any more than we can see our own noses.\u00a0<a title=\"CACM.ACM.org\" href=\"http:\/\/cacm.acm.org\/magazines\/2009\/7\/32082-are-we-losing-our-ability-to-think-critically\/fulltext\" target=\"_blank\">Samuel Greengard<\/a>, in an article titled, &#8220;Are We Losing Our Ability to Think Critically?&#8221; wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Although there&#8217;s little debate that computer technology complements\u2014and often enhances\u2014the human mind in the quest to store information and process an ever-growing tangle of bits and bytes, there&#8217;s increasing concern that the same technology is changing the way we approach complex problems and conundrums, and making it more difficult to really think.<br \/>\n&#8220;We&#8217;re exposed to [greater amounts of] poor yet charismatic thinking, the fads of intellectual fashion, opinion, and mere assertion,&#8221; says (Adrian) West. &#8220;The wealth of communications and information can easily overwhelm our reasoning abilities.&#8221; What&#8217;s more, it&#8217;s ironic that ever-growing piles of data and information do not equate to greater knowledge and better decision-making. What&#8217;s remarkable, West says, is just &#8220;how little this has affected the quality of our thinking.&#8221;<br \/>\nAccording to the National Endowment for the Arts, literary reading declined 10 percentage points from 1982 to 2002 and the rate of decline is accelerating. Many, including Patricia Greenfield, a UCLA distinguished professor of psychology and director of the Children&#8217;s Digital Media Center, Los Angeles, believe that a greater focus on visual media exacts a toll. &#8220;A drop-off in reading has possibly contributed to a decline in critical thinking,&#8221; she says. &#8220;There is a greater emphasis on real-time media and multitasking rather than focusing on a single thing.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Losing a skill doesn&#8217;t necessarily make one stupid. It depends on how often the skill is used and for what purpose. How many adults under 50 can add up columns of numbers without a calculator? How many adults under 30 can write out a page in longhand? How many of them can spell all the words correctly? They may have other, compensatory skills. Just like I can&#8217;t milk a cow or plow a straight furrow, but I can drive to a store and shop for milk and veggies.<\/p>\n<p>But losing a skill in thinking is dangerous.<\/p>\n<p>Just judging by the number of people who comment on some of these sites, subscribe to their feeds, or share their content on Facebook, it&#8217;s clear many\u00a0people cannot identify the obvious craziness of cults, New Age nonsense, creationism, or homeopathy and mistake them for having substance.<\/p>\n<p>Some cannot discern the difference between a personal political agenda spewed vituperatively on a blog and a considered political opinion. Some cannot tell the difference between historical fact and historical fantasy, between observation and paranoia, or between science and pseudoscience. Their definition\u00a0of &#8220;truth&#8221; becomes elastic: based on opinion and anecdote &#8211; or even outright fiction &#8211; rather than on fact or evidence (an experience we have even encountered locally).<\/p>\n<p>This is not by any means new: we can look through history and see cults, madness, political manipulation and pseudoscience. What has changed is the technology by which these are spread: the internet makes it remarkably easy to present content to a wide audience. What the technology\u00a0doesn&#8217;t do it vet that content for reliability. There\u00a0is no way to identify the fantasy from the reality once you lose your ability to think critically about that content.<\/p>\n<p>The breadth of content online may be breathtaking, but\u00a0the depth isn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p><strong>~~~~~<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*<\/span> For a later post, I&#8217;ll look at the related book, <a title=\"KK.org\" href=\"http:\/\/kk.org\/books\/what-technology-wants.php\" target=\"_blank\">What Technology Wants<\/a>, by Kevin Kelly. &#8220;It suggests that technology as a whole is not just a jumble of wires and metal but a living, evolving organism that has its own unconscious needs and tendencies.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p id=\"pvc_stats_11464\" class=\"pvc_stats all  \" data-element-id=\"11464\" style=\"\"><i class=\"pvc-stats-icon medium\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" version=\"1.0\" viewBox=\"0 0 502 315\" preserveAspectRatio=\"xMidYMid meet\"><g transform=\"translate(0,332) scale(0.1,-0.1)\" fill=\"\" stroke=\"none\"><path d=\"M2394 3279 l-29 -30 -3 -207 c-2 -182 0 -211 15 -242 39 -76 157 -76 196 0 15 31 17 60 15 243 l-3 209 -33 29 c-26 23 -41 29 -80 29 -41 0 -53 -5 -78 -31z\"\/><path d=\"M3085 3251 c-45 -19 -58 -50 -96 -229 -47 -217 -49 -260 -13 -295 52 -53 146 -42 177 20 16 31 87 366 87 410 0 70 -86 122 -155 94z\"\/><path d=\"M1751 3234 c-13 -9 -29 -31 -37 -50 -12 -29 -10 -49 21 -204 19 -94 39 -189 45 -210 14 -50 54 -80 110 -80 34 0 48 6 76 34 21 21 34 44 34 59 0 14 -18 113 -40 219 -37 178 -43 195 -70 221 -36 32 -101 37 -139 11z\"\/><path d=\"M1163 3073 c-36 -7 -73 -59 -73 -102 0 -56 133 -378 171 -413 34 -32 83 -37 129 -13 70 36 67 87 -16 290 -86 209 -89 214 -129 231 -35 14 -42 15 -82 7z\"\/><path d=\"M3689 3066 c-15 -9 -33 -30 -42 -48 -48 -103 -147 -355 -147 -375 0 -98 131 -148 192 -74 13 15 57 108 97 206 80 196 84 226 37 273 -30 30 -99 39 -137 18z\"\/><path d=\"M583 2784 c-38 -19 -67 -74 -58 -113 9 -42 211 -354 242 -373 16 -10 45 -18 66 -18 51 0 107 52 107 100 0 39 -1 41 -124 234 -80 126 -108 162 -133 173 -41 17 -61 16 -100 -3z\"\/><path d=\"M4250 2784 c-14 -9 -74 -91 -133 -183 -95 -150 -107 -173 -107 -213 0 -55 33 -94 87 -104 67 -13 90 8 211 198 130 202 137 225 78 284 -27 27 -42 34 -72 34 -22 0 -50 -8 -64 -16z\"\/><path d=\"M2275 2693 c-553 -48 -1095 -270 -1585 -649 -135 -104 -459 -423 -483 -476 -23 -49 -22 -139 2 -186 73 -142 361 -457 571 -626 285 -228 642 -407 990 -497 242 -63 336 -73 660 -74 310 0 370 5 595 52 535 111 1045 392 1455 803 122 121 250 273 275 326 19 41 19 137 0 174 -41 79 -309 363 -465 492 -447 370 -946 591 -1479 653 -113 14 -422 18 -536 8z m395 -428 c171 -34 330 -124 456 -258 112 -119 167 -219 211 -378 27 -96 24 -300 -5 -401 -72 -255 -236 -447 -474 -557 -132 -62 -201 -76 -368 -76 -167 0 -236 14 -368 76 -213 98 -373 271 -451 485 -162 444 86 934 547 1084 153 49 292 57 452 25z m909 -232 c222 -123 408 -262 593 -441 76 -74 138 -139 138 -144 0 -16 -233 -242 -330 -319 -155 -123 -309 -223 -461 -299 l-81 -41 32 46 c18 26 49 83 70 128 143 306 141 649 -6 957 -25 52 -61 116 -79 142 l-34 47 45 -20 c26 -10 76 -36 113 -56z m-2057 25 c-40 -58 -105 -190 -130 -263 -110 -324 -59 -707 132 -981 25 -35 42 -64 37 -64 -19 0 -241 119 -326 174 -188 122 -406 314 -532 468 l-58 71 108 103 c185 178 428 349 672 473 66 33 121 60 123 61 2 0 -10 -19 -26 -42z\"\/><path d=\"M2375 1950 c-198 -44 -350 -190 -395 -379 -18 -76 -8 -221 19 -290 114 -284 457 -406 731 -260 98 52 188 154 231 260 27 69 37 214 19 290 -38 163 -166 304 -326 360 -67 23 -215 33 -279 19z\"\/><\/g><\/svg><\/i> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" alt=\"Loading\" src=\"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/page-views-count\/ajax-loader-2x.gif\" border=0 \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"pvc_clear\"><\/div>\n<p>In my never-ending search for some bit of knowledge one day, during a mix-and-match of search engine terms while looking for classical writers&#8217; views on death and dying, I stumbled onto what might have been an off-kilter New Age site, OM Times, or more likely, a parody of the genre. On the page titled &#8220;8 Things You Didn\u2019t Know About Death,&#8221; I read, &#8220;&#8230; light rays have qualities like wisdom, kindness, compassion and intelligence. This light makes visible what is invisible on earth, the Divine nature of all things&#8230;.&#8221; Loud guffaws broke the cool silence of the house and startled \u2026&#8230;&#8230; click below for more \u2193<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[261,96],"tags":[166,24,75,29],"class_list":["post-11464","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-critical-thinking-2","category-social-order-disorder","tag-critical-thinking","tag-culture","tag-language","tag-science"],"a3_pvc":{"activated":true,"total_views":9112,"today_views":0},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11464"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11556,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11464\/revisions\/11556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}