{"id":8548,"date":"2014-04-18T19:44:33","date_gmt":"2014-04-18T23:44:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/?p=8548"},"modified":"2014-04-18T19:44:33","modified_gmt":"2014-04-18T23:44:33","slug":"lost-shakespeare-play-found","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/lost-shakespeare-play-found\/","title":{"rendered":"Lost Shakespeare play found?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i> \"Loading\"<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

\"BBC\"<\/a>Cardenio<\/a>. Written by William Shakespeare. Based on an episode in Miguel Cervantes’ novel, Don Quixote.<\/strong> The novel was translated from Spanish into English in 1612.<\/p>\n

The play was known once, but lost. Performed by the King’s Men in 1613, the same year Shakespeare penned Henry VIII, or All is True and The Two Noble Kinsmen. Performed before June 29th, the day the Globe theatre burned down<\/a> during a performance of Henry VIII.<\/p>\n

Cardenio was entered in the Stationer’s Register in 1653 as a collaboration by playwrights Fletcher and Shakespeare. The Guardian<\/a> explains:<\/p>\n

In 1653 the leading English publisher of plays and poetry, Humphrey Moseley, registered his copyright in a list of 42 plays. Somewhere mid-list is “The History of Cardenio, by Mr Fletcher & Shakespeare”. Shakespeare had yet to become English literature’s biggest cash cow, and Moseley never published that play (or many others that he registered). Moseley’s title-phrase, The History of Cardenio, appears verbatim in the first English translation of Part One of Don Quixote, published in 1612. Since the phrase appears nowhere else in English, the play that Moseley registered must, logically speaking, have dramatised the Cardenio episodes from Cervantes’s novel. It’s a plausible attribution to Fletcher and Shakespeare.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But since then, it has been lost. Sort of. Contenders have surfaced, of course. Lost Shakespeare manuscripts have been\u00a0a sort of cottage industry since the early 18th century.<\/p>\n

The Second Maiden’s Tragedy<\/a>, a 1611 play, was identified as being by Shakespeare by a handwriting expert in 1990, but it’s a contested attribution. Most scholars say it was written by Thomas Middleton. Some argue that Shakespeare, if he were involved, was a minor collaborator. Most just shrug it off.<\/p>\n

Another play – Double Falsehood<\/a> – was allegedly an early 18th-century rewrite of Shakespeare’s original by lawyer and playwright, Lewis Theobald (a lot of his plays got that treatment in the 18th century). Theobald claimed to have three originals in his possession when he “refined” the play for contemporary audience.<\/p>\n

From The Guardian<\/a> again:<\/p>\n

In December 1727 the Drury Lane theatre performed a play based on the Cardenio episodes in Don Quixote, and based in particular on the 1612 translation. It was called Double Falshood, or The Distrest Lovers, and the edition printed that month declared it was “written originally by W Shakespeare; and now revised and adapted to the stage by Mr Theobald”. Lewis Theobald was a minor playwright, minor poet and the world’s first Shakespeare scholar.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Again, highly disputed, and considered by some as a fake written to ride on the coattails of the growing Bardolatry of the age. Here’s a part of the story<\/a>:<\/p>\n

…Theobald\u2019s reputation was not pristine. In 1716 he had been accused of plagiarism by a watchmaker named Henry Meysteyer, who had given Theobald an early draft of a play, looking for advice. After four months of work rewriting the play, Theobald considered it to be entirely his own work. The practice of adapting old plays and claiming sole credit for the result was not unusual at the time, though other playwrights sensibly chose dead dramatists to steal from.
\nTheobald\u2019s adaptation of the lost Shakespeare play, which he called Double Falsehood, premiered at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, on December 13, 1727. To ensure its success, Theobald persuaded the age\u2019s great actor, Barton Booth, then in failing health, to come out of retirement to play the lead. It was Booth\u2019s last role before his health was permanently ruined, and Theobald was blamed for hastening Booth\u2019s death. But it worked: the play was a huge success.
\nTheobald published his adaptation the next year, with a preface in which he explained the provenance of one of his three manuscripts:<\/p>\n

one of the Manuscript Copies, which I have, is of above Sixty Years Standing, in the Handwriting of Mr. Downes, the famous Old Prompter; and, as I am credibly inform\u2019d, was early in the Possession of the celebrated Mr. Betterton, and by Him design\u2019d to have been usher\u2019d into the World\u2026 There is a Tradition (which I have from the Noble Person, who supply\u2019d me with One of my Copies) that this Play was given by our Author, as a Present of Value, to a Natural Daughter of his, for whose Sake he wrote it, in the Time of his Retirement from the Stage.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

For the past two centuries Theobald\u2019s play, along with the provenance he gave it, has largely been considered a hoax. Was it a coincidence, then, that Theobald picked the same plot as a lost Shakespeare play for a clever attempt at forgery, or could it be possible that a manuscript of Cardenio lies behind Double Falsehood?…
\nTheobald\u2019s three Cardenio manuscripts disappeared. They were rumored to be held by the Covent Garden Theatre\u2014perhaps purchased for the revival of Double Falsehood by David Garrick in 1770\u2014but that theater burned down in 1808. Or they might have been purchased from Theobald\u2019s estate sale by the critic William Warburton, who left a pile of manuscripts sitting on his kitchen table. His cook assumed they were garbage and used the paper to line pie tins. But Theobald\u2019s adaptation went through three editions in quick order, and many copies of Double Falsehood have survived to the present day.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now there are claims another manuscript has been found<\/a>, a printed version of the original, hidden among the books in a family heirloom. As the story says:<\/p>\n

The team of experts from the auction house Christie\u2019s, have confirmed this morning that a 16th century book found recently in the personnal collection of a recently deceased English Lord, is indeed an authentic printed version of William Shakespeare\u2019s lost play, The History of Cardenio.<\/p>\n

The book was discovered last year by employees proceeding to a successorale inventory, after the death of the Sir Humphrey McElroy, a rich baron and antiques collector from Brighton. It was at first treated as a possible fake, but all the analysis that were realized since have suggested otherwise. The authenticity of both the ink and the paper have now been confirmed, and it seems it is indeed, a late 16th print.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Stranger things have happened. But is it likely? So far I can’t find another confirmation that the story is factual, or indeed any more substantive information about the manuscript.<\/p>\n

More to follow as the story gets more play. So to speak…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<\/div>\n

<\/g><\/svg><\/i> \"Loading\"<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Cardenio. Written by William Shakespeare. Based on an episode in Miguel Cervantes’ novel, Don Quixote. The novel was translated from Spanish into English in 1612. The play was known once, but lost. Performed by the King’s Men in 1613, the same year Shakespeare penned Henry VIII, or All is True and The Two Noble Kinsmen. Performed before June 29th, the day the Globe theatre burned down during a performance of Henry VIII. Cardenio was entered in the Stationer’s Register in 1653 as a collaboration by playwrights Fletcher and Shakespeare. The Guardian explains: In 1653 the leading English publisher of plays \u2026…… click below for more \u2193<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[8,58,72],"tags":[406,60,29,136],"class_list":["post-8548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-history","category-books-by-the-bedside","tag-books-reviews","tag-history-2","tag-science","tag-shakespeare"],"a3_pvc":{"activated":true,"total_views":13745,"today_views":0},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8548"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8562,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548\/revisions\/8562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ianchadwick.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}