This post has already been read 893 times!
My negative comments on the impending privatization of our electrical utility (and potentially our water utility once the first deal is sealed) drew some online criticism recently. None of those critics refuted any of the facts I offered, or attempted to debunk any of the numerous documents I quoted and linked to.
Nor could they. After all, they are easily proven, well-documented facts. But still, they called me a liar and attempted to use other cheap ad hominem tactics to discredit me.* However, regardless of their like or dislike of me, the facts remain, the facts speak for themselves. Facts matter; name-calling doesn’t.
It’s not about me. It’s not even about the decision to sell the utility. It’s about the process used to get to that point. And that means it’s also about the people who chose that process over an open and transparent one. Open and transparent is honest. Anything else isn’t. If you can defend such dishonesty, then we can’t have a reasonable discussion about the process.
We elect representatives to make our decisions for us. That’s what a democracy is all about. And for the most part, the public leaves those representatives alone to do their job. But when a major issue arises, such as the sale of a publicly-owned asset, those representatives are bound by both honour and ethics to both inform and consult the public. Neither of which have been done this term.
The process this term has been appallingly secretive and deceptive. We elected people whom we trusted to accomplish their job with consideration of the basic rules or ethics and morality. And they didn’t follow them. They betrayed the public trust and they continue to do so.
Whether or not the utility can or should be sold is not relevant. If our representatives follow an open process to arrive at that decision, if they keep the public informed and discuss the issues in public, then whether anyone agrees with it is only an opinion. But that wasn’t done at any stage this term. And it’s still not being done. The public has a right to be outraged at that.
Yes, I am offended by privatization of public assets. I do not believe that is in the public interest and will always resist it. And yes, I am offended by many among our council using public resources and money to pursue private agendas and vendettas instead of acting for the greater good. But the issue here is the process. I am – as are many in our municipality, even our town staff – offended by the process. I am offended by secrecy, by deception and by lies.
I believe where public assets are involved, every council should be open, should be honest and should engage the public in such decisions, not dictate them nor decide them behind closed doors. I am offended by the process this term, and if you care about this community, so should you be.
Collingwood deserves better.
- 536 words
- 3124 characters
- Reading time: 174 s
- Speaking time: 268s